Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Deployment product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Application Interface). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.4. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Deployment. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel CRM Deployment accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 2.6 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N).
Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Integration product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Event Publish and Subscribe). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.4. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows physical access to compromise Siebel CRM Integration. While the vulnerability is in Siebel CRM Integration, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel CRM Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 1.9 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N).
Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, the HAProxy PROXY protocol v2 codec in netty leaks native or heap memory on every connection when a client sends a syntactically valid header containing nested `PP2_TYPE_SSL` TLVs (type-length-value records) at depth two or greater. The leak occurs on the successful parse path — no exception is thrown, the message fires downstream, the decoder removes itself, and the application releases the `HAProxyMessage` normally. Yet the underlying cumulation buffer (a pooled, potentially direct `ByteBuf` allocated by the channel) remains permanently pinned. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.
| Version | Type | Source | Base | Exp | Imp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | NVD | 7.5 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Primary | cve.org | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Secondary | GHSA | 7.5 | — | — |
| 3.1 | Secondary | NVD | 7.5 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Primary | cve.org | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Secondary | GHSA | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Secondary | NVD | 8.7 | — | — |
| 4.0 | Secondary | ENISA EUVD | 8.7 | — | — |