Powered by data from 22+ sources — NVD, cve.org, EPSS, CISA KEV, OSV, GHSA, MITRE ATT&CK, and more.

About & licensesSource status
cvekit
CockpitCVEsATT&CKActorsSources
----‑--‑-- · --:--:-- UTCLIVE
Clear1,716 matching
CVEs · 1,716page 1 / 35
CVE-2026-53266HIGH8.8EPSS 2%Analyzed

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bridge: make ebt_snat ARP rewrite writable The ebtables SNAT target keeps the Ethernet source address rewrite behind skb_ensure_writable(skb, 0). This is intentional: at the bridge ebtables hooks the Ethernet header is addressed through skb_mac_header()/eth_hdr(), while skb->data points at the Ethernet payload. Asking skb_ensure_writable() for ETH_HLEN bytes would check the payload, not the Ethernet header, and would reintroduce the small packet regression fixed by commit 63137bc5882a. However, the optional ARP sender hardware address rewrite is different. It writes through skb_store_bits() at an offset relative to skb->data: skb_store_bits(skb, sizeof(struct arphdr), info->mac, ETH_ALEN) skb_header_pointer() only safely reads the ARP header; it does not make the later sender hardware address range writable. If that range is still held in a nonlinear skb fragment backed by a splice-imported file page, skb_store_bits() maps the frag page and copies the new MAC address directly into it. Ensure the ARP SHA range is writable before reading the ARP header and before calling skb_store_bits().

CVE-2025-39964MEDIUM5.5EPSS 26%Analyzed

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: af_alg - Disallow concurrent writes in af_alg_sendmsg Issuing two writes to the same af_alg socket is bogus as the data will be interleaved in an unpredictable fashion. Furthermore, concurrent writes may create inconsistencies in the internal socket state. Disallow this by adding a new ctx->write field that indiciates exclusive ownership for writing.

CVE-2025-39682HIGH7.1EPSS 42%Analyzing

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: fix handling of zero-length records on the rx_list Each recvmsg() call must process either - only contiguous DATA records (any number of them) - one non-DATA record If the next record has different type than what has already been processed we break out of the main processing loop. If the record has already been decrypted (which may be the case for TLS 1.3 where we don't know type until decryption) we queue the pending record to the rx_list. Next recvmsg() will pick it up from there. Queuing the skb to rx_list after zero-copy decrypt is not possible, since in that case we decrypted directly to the user space buffer, and we don't have an skb to queue (darg.skb points to the ciphertext skb for access to metadata like length). Only data records are allowed zero-copy, and we break the processing loop after each non-data record. So we should never zero-copy and then find out that the record type has changed. The corner case we missed is when the initial record comes from rx_list, and it's zero length.

CVE-2026-81963HIGH7.8EPSS 49%Analyzed

Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows Update Stack allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVE-2026-85880HIGH7.8EPSS 46%Analyzed

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows ALPC allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVE-2026-87886NONEEPSS 21%Analyzed

Local privilege escalation due to insecure file permissions. The following products are affected: Acronis Backup plugin for cPanel & WHM (Linux) before build 1.9.3.1021, Acronis Backup extension for Plesk (Linux) before build 1.8.11.638, Acronis Backup plugin for DirectAdmin (Linux) before build 1.2.3.238.

CVE-2026-76461CRITICAL9.8EPSS 80%Analyzed

A vulnerability in the email parsing of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation in the email parsing logic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email message that contains malicious SQL statements through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL statements, leading to command execution with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

CVE-2026-55040CRITICAL9.1EPSS 99%Analyzed

Weak authentication in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

CVE-2026-58644CRITICAL9.8EPSS 97%Analyzed

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

CVE-2026-50522CRITICAL9.8EPSS 100%Analyzed

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

CVE-2026-56164CRITICAL9.8EPSS 98%Analyzed

Missing authentication for critical function in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

CVE-2026-56155HIGH7.8EPSS 28%Analyzed

Insufficient granularity of access control in Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVE-2026-76460CRITICAL10.0EPSS 54%Analyzed

A vulnerability in an API of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication. This vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication control on an API endpoint. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected API endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized access to the affected device by bypassing the web-based management interface.

CVE-2026-58704HIGH8.8EPSS 11%Analyzed

In Cellular Modem, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

CVE-2026-20349HIGH8.6EPSS 82%Analyzed

A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service for Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.  This vulnerability is due to insufficient error checking when processing HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the Remote Access SSL VPN service on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.

CVE-2026-20316MEDIUM5.3EPSS 96%Analyzed

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to log in to an affected device using a low-privileged account to access sensitive data within the impacted systems. This vulnerability is due to the presence of static user credentials for a low-privileged account. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using the account to log in to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to log in to the affected system and access sensitive data as the low-privileged user.  Note: If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.   Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of High rather than Medium as the score indicates. The reason is that this vulnerability can be used with other Cisco Secure FMC Software vulnerabilities to elevate privileges.

CVE-2026-20079CRITICAL10.0EPSS 100%Analyzed

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute script files on an affected device to obtain root access to the underlying operating system.  This vulnerability is due to an improper system process that is created at boot time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute a variety of scripts and commands that allow root access to the device. 

CVE-2026-68820HIGH7.0EPSS 93%Analyzed

Use after free in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

CVE-2026-65400CRITICAL9.8EPSS 96%Analyzed

An authentication issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.7.9, macOS Sonoma 14.8.9, macOS Tahoe 26.6.1, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An attacker on the network may be able to authenticate to Screen Sharing without valid credentials.

CVE-2026-85706CRITICAL10.0EPSS 96%Analyzed

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.7 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that, under certain conditions, an unauthenticated user could have read arbitrary files from the GitLab server due to improper path confinement and missing authentication enforcement in the repository commits API.

CVE-2026-82078CRITICAL9.1EPSS 89%Analyzed

An unsafe dynamic class loading vulnerability exists in the database connection utilities of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. The application instantiates database driver classes based on configurable driver names without validating against an allowlist of approved drivers. If an attacker can manipulate system configuration parameters, this enables the execution of arbitrary Java bytecode residing on the application classpath under the security context of the PaperCut server process.

CVE-2026-81578CRITICAL9.8EPSS 88%Analyzed

An improper access control vulnerability exists in the web management interface of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. Under specific conditions, unauthenticated remote requests targeting administrative functions can trigger backend actions prior to the completion of access validation checks. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to modify certain system configurations.

CVE-2026-84869CRITICAL9.9EPSS 51%Analyzed

A condition in the ScreenConnect client may allow files to be transferred and executed through an active remote session without authorization or Host confirmation in certain circumstances. ScreenConnect servers are not impacted.

CVE-2026-42018HIGH7.5EPSS 59%Analyzed

JFrog Artifactory could return an internal anonymous-user token to an unauthenticated caller when anonymous access is disabled, potentially exposing sensitive resources.

CVE-2026-42016HIGH8.8EPSS 58%Analyzed

JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions before 7.133.11 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack due to a validation check of the token signature/issuer and not the token’s scope.

CVE-2026-59310CRITICAL9.8EPSS 99%Analyzed

VMware vCenter contains a directory traversal vulnerability in the Syslog server. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code.

CVE-2026-67277HIGH8.2EPSS 57%Analyzed

RouterOS accepts a "related" btest connection before the corresponding primary session has completed authentication. An unauthenticated client can use this state to start an IPv4 UDP test. With "random-data=false", the sender transmits an uninitialized tail from a kernel packet buffer. A separate unchecked, inverted packet-size interval causes unsigned integer underflow, anomalously large fragmented output, and can restart the RouterOS kernel. This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

CVE-2026-86060CRITICAL9.8EPSS 63%Analyzed

RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

CVE-2026-87491HIGH8.8EPSS 61%Analyzed

Out of bounds write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

CVE-2026-19490CRITICAL9.8EPSS 93%Analyzed

Vulnerability in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: from 14.1 through 73.32 and from 13.1 through 63.21; Gateway: from 14.1 through 73.32 and from 13.1 through 63.21.

CVE-2025-25249CRITICAL9.8EPSS 83%Analyzed

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.17, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets

CVE-2022-41352CRITICAL9.8EPSS 100%Analyzed

An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.

CVE-2022-37969HIGH7.8EPSS 98%Analyzed

Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

CVE-2016-7255HIGH7.8EPSS 100%Analyzed

The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607, and Windows Server 2016 allow local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."

CVE-2016-4117CRITICAL9.8EPSS 100%Analyzed

Adobe Flash Player 21.0.0.226 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, as exploited in the wild in May 2016.

CVE-2026-86218CRITICAL9.8EPSS 53%Analyzed

N-central is vulnerable to a pre-auth remote code execution This issue affects N-central: before 2026.3.1.14.

CVE-2026-75650CRITICAL10.0EPSS 81%Analyzed

Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

CVE-2025-14733CRITICAL9.8EPSS 98%Analyzed

An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the WatchGuard Fireware OS iked process may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects both the mobile user VPN with IKEv2 and the branch office VPN using IKEv2 when configured with a dynamic gateway peer. If the Firebox was previously configured with the mobile user VPN with IKEv2 or a branch office VPN using IKEv2 to a dynamic gateway peer, and both of those configurations have since been deleted, that Firebox may still be vulnerable if a branch office VPN to a static gateway peer is still configured.

CVE-2025-67038CRITICAL9.8EPSS 97%Analyzed

An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. The HTTP RPC module executes a shell command to write logs when user's authentication fails. The username is directly concatenated with the command without any sanitization. This allow attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands into the username parameter. Injected commands are executed with root privileges.

CVE-2025-38352HIGH7.8EPSS 68%Analyzed

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del() If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand(). If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or lock_task_sighand() will fail. Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this. This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail anyway in this case.

CVE-2026-60004CRITICAL9.8EPSS 100%Analyzed

Gitea before 1.27.1 allows remote code execution via the diffpatch API through Git hook installation.

CVE-2026-31431HIGH7.8EPSS 100%Analyzed

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.

CVE-2026-85046HIGH8.8EPSS 72%Analyzed

Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.82 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

CVE-2026-48710MEDIUM6.5EPSS 98%Analyzed

Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values.

CVE-2023-50224MEDIUM6.5EPSS 97%Analyzed

TP-Link TL-WR841N dropbearpwd Improper Authentication Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of TP-Link TL-WR841N routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the httpd service, which listens on TCP port 80 by default. The issue results from improper authentication. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose stored credentials, leading to further compromise. Was ZDI-CAN-19899.

CVE-2026-9586CRITICAL9.8EPSS 96%Analyzed

An unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in Sangoma Switchvox SMB Edition 8.3 (104997). The /pa endpoint processes XML content beginning with <PolycomIPPhone> and directly concatenates the user-controlled PhoneIP value into PostgreSQL queries without sanitization or parameterization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary SQL statements against the backend PostgreSQL database using a single crafted request, including database operations and remote code execution.

CVE-2026-83549HIGH7.8EPSS 95%Analyzed

Post-authentication Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Management Console (AMC) which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker as administrator to execute arbitrary OS commands, resulting in remote code execution.

CVE-2026-83548CRITICAL10.0EPSS 91%Analyzed

A Pre-authentication SSRF vulnerability exists in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface due to an unintended alternate access path. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive functionality and perform unauthorized operations.

CVE-2026-82329CRITICAL9.8EPSS 94%Analyzed

JFrog Artifactory contains an authentication weakness that, under default configuration, may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to obtain administrative privileges.

CVE-2026-59822HIGH8.2EPSS 57%Analyzed

LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. Prior to 1.84.0, LiteLLM's MCP Streamable HTTP endpoint allowed an unauthenticated attacker to use a fabricated Authorization header to trigger an OAuth2 passthrough fallback path that replaced failed LiteLLM key validation with an empty UserAPIKeyAuth() object, allowing requests to reach MCP tooling without a valid LiteLLM key. This issue is fixed in version 1.84.0.

1,716 CVEs
1 / 35

CVE-2026-31431

HIGH7.8KEVWeaponized
CNA: LinuxPublished: 2026-04-22Modified: 11 days ago
Open full
Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.

CVSS v3.1
7.8
HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
AVLACLPRLUINSUCHIHAH
CVSS across sources22
VersionTypeSourceBaseExpImp
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1Primarycve.org7.8——
3.1SecondaryNVD7.81.85.9
3.1SecondaryNVD7.81.85.9
3.1SecondaryENISA EUVD7.8——
Modification timeline
  • GitHub PoC11 days ago3924 obs
  • ENISA EUVD11 days ago1379 obs
  • NVD11 days ago12 obs
  • cve.org11 days ago12 obs
  • CISA KEV11 days ago90 obs
  • EPSS11 days ago89 obs
Vendor statements36
  • access.redhat.com
  • access.redhat.com
  • access.redhat.com
  • access.redhat.com
  • access.redhat.com
  • access.redhat.com
  • access.redhat.com
  • access.redhat.com
  • +28 more
Timeline
  1. 2026-03-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  2. 2026-04-22
    CVE published
  3. 2026-04-29
    Public exploit published on metasploit
  4. 2026-04-29
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  5. 2026-04-29
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  6. 2026-04-29
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  7. 2026-04-29
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  8. 2026-04-29
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  9. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  10. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  11. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  12. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  13. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  14. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  15. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  16. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  17. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  18. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  19. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  20. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  21. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  22. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  23. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  24. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  25. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  26. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  27. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  28. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  29. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  30. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  31. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  32. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  33. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  34. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  35. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  36. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  37. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  38. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  39. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  40. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  41. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  42. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  43. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  44. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  45. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  46. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  47. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  48. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  49. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  50. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  51. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  52. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  53. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  54. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  55. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  56. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  57. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  58. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  59. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  60. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  61. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  62. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  63. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  64. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  65. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  66. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  67. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  68. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  69. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  70. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  71. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  72. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  73. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  74. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  75. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  76. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  77. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  78. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  79. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  80. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  81. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  82. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  83. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  84. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  85. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  86. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  87. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  88. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  89. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  90. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  91. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  92. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  93. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  94. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  95. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  96. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  97. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  98. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  99. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  100. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  101. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  102. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  103. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  104. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  105. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  106. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  107. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  108. 2026-04-30
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  109. 2026-05-01
    Added to CISA KEV catalog
  110. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  111. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  112. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  113. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  114. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  115. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  116. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  117. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  118. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  119. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  120. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  121. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  122. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  123. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  124. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  125. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  126. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  127. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  128. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  129. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  130. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  131. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  132. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  133. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  134. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  135. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  136. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  137. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  138. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  139. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  140. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  141. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  142. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  143. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  144. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  145. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  146. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  147. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  148. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  149. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  150. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  151. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  152. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  153. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  154. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  155. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  156. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  157. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  158. 2026-05-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  159. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  160. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  161. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  162. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  163. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  164. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  165. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  166. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  167. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  168. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  169. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  170. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  171. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  172. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  173. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  174. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  175. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  176. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  177. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  178. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  179. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  180. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  181. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  182. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  183. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  184. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  185. 2026-05-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  186. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  187. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  188. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  189. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  190. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  191. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  192. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  193. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  194. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  195. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  196. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  197. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  198. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  199. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  200. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  201. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  202. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  203. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  204. 2026-05-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  205. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  206. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  207. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  208. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  209. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  210. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  211. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  212. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  213. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  214. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  215. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  216. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  217. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  218. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  219. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  220. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  221. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  222. 2026-05-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  223. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  224. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  225. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  226. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  227. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  228. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  229. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  230. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  231. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  232. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  233. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  234. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  235. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  236. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  237. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  238. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  239. 2026-05-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  240. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  241. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  242. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  243. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  244. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  245. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  246. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  247. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  248. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  249. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  250. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  251. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  252. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  253. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  254. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  255. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  256. 2026-05-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  257. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  258. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  259. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  260. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  261. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  262. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  263. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  264. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  265. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  266. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  267. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  268. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  269. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  270. 2026-05-07
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  271. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  272. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  273. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  274. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  275. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  276. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  277. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  278. 2026-05-08
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  279. 2026-05-09
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  280. 2026-05-09
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  281. 2026-05-09
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  282. 2026-05-09
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  283. 2026-05-09
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  284. 2026-05-10
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  285. 2026-05-10
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  286. 2026-05-10
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  287. 2026-05-11
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  288. 2026-05-11
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  289. 2026-05-11
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  290. 2026-05-11
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  291. 2026-05-11
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  292. 2026-05-12
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  293. 2026-05-12
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  294. 2026-05-12
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  295. 2026-05-12
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  296. 2026-05-12
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  297. 2026-05-12
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  298. 2026-05-13
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  299. 2026-05-13
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  300. 2026-05-13
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  301. 2026-05-13
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  302. 2026-05-13
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  303. 2026-05-14
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  304. 2026-05-14
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  305. 2026-05-15
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  306. 2026-05-16
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  307. 2026-05-16
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  308. 2026-05-16
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  309. 2026-05-17
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  310. 2026-05-18
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  311. 2026-05-18
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  312. 2026-05-18
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  313. 2026-05-18
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  314. 2026-05-19
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  315. 2026-05-20
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  316. 2026-05-21
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  317. 2026-05-21
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  318. 2026-05-21
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  319. 2026-05-22
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  320. 2026-05-22
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  321. 2026-05-22
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  322. 2026-05-22
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  323. 2026-05-24
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  324. 2026-05-28
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  325. 2026-05-29
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  326. 2026-06-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  327. 2026-06-01
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  328. 2026-06-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  329. 2026-06-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  330. 2026-06-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  331. 2026-06-15
    First observed by epss
  332. 2026-06-15
    First observed by cisa_kev
  333. 2026-06-15
    First observed by metasploit
  334. 2026-06-15
    First observed by github_poc
  335. 2026-06-15
    First observed by cve_org
  336. 2026-06-15
    First observed by nvd
  337. 2026-06-24
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  338. 2026-06-27
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  339. 2026-07-05
    First observed by euvd
  340. 2026-07-06
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  341. 2026-07-25
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  342. 2026-07-31
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  343. 2026-08-02
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  344. 2026-08-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  345. 2026-08-05
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  346. 2026-09-03
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  347. 2026-09-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  348. 2026-09-04
    Public exploit published on github_poc
  349. 2026-09-08
    Last metadata update